この Link あなたの言語には存在しません, で見る: English (en),
またはGoogle翻訳を使用する:  

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107657

Stéphanie Lavergne, Anne Vanasse, Marie-Noëlle Thivierge, Caroline Halde,
Volume 322, 2021,107657,ISSN 0167-8809,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107657.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880921003613)
Abstract: In eastern Canada, organic grain producers have a rising interest in using cover crop mixtures instead of pure stands to maximize ecosystem services. Yield stability and belowground biomass of cover crop mixtures have however received limited attention in the scientific literature, although they do affect ecosystem services. The aims of this study were to evaluate the aboveground and belowground biomass and yield stability of pea-based cover crop mixtures, and to assess species-specific contributions to aboveground biomass. In a field experiment conducted at three site-years in Quebec, Canada, a pure stand of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and cover crop mixtures of 2, 6, and 12 species, all including field pea, were compared to a weedy control (without cover crop). The mixtures were seeded according to a substitutive unbalanced design. The proportion of field pea ranged from 45% to 93% of the aboveground plant biomass within all mixtures. Among all site-years, pure stand of field pea provided the highest aboveground biomass (2636 kg ha−1), followed by the 2-species mixture (2320 kg ha−1) and both multi-species cover crop mixtures (mean of 1849 kg ha−1). Aboveground biomass was inversely correlated to cover crop diversity (Pearson coefficient of −0.73), and inversely correlated to weed biomass (Pearson coefficient of −0.54). Pure stand of field pea had the lowest belowground biomass and stability (693 kg ha−1, CV of 28%) when compared to mixtures (886 kg ha−1, CV of 14% on average). This study confirms that the value of pea-based mixtures, compared to a pure stand of field pea, lies mainly below the soil surface rather than above it. This could likely enhance many soil-related ecosystem services.

Keywords: Ecological services; Root biomass; Yield stability; Green manure; Plant diversity; Organic farming; Weed management
 


Collections